Side-by-side comparison of two testing Claude Code skills
| Feature | getting-started | dev |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Level | Basic | Basic |
| Quality Score | 2/5 | 1.9/5 |
| GitHub Stars | 0 | 0 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Has Tests | No | No |
| Security Verdict | Pending | Pending |
Based on quality score, trust level, and security analysis, getting-started scores higher overall. However, the best choice depends on your specific use case.
Analyze the current repo structure, build system, test setup, and conventions to provide a practical onboarding guide. Use when new to a codebase, joining a project, or wanting to understand how a rep
Implementer - fetches a GitHub issue, builds an implementation plan, then implements using TDD. Use when: implement, build this, code this, add this feature, TDD, test first, red green refactor, pick
getting-started has a quality score of 2.0/5 and trust level 2/5. dev has a quality score of 1.9/5 and trust level 2/5. Both are testing skills for Claude Code.
Based on GritFlow's quality scoring and security analysis, getting-started scores higher overall. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — review each skill's features and security report.
getting-started: Pending (trust 2/5). dev: Pending (trust 2/5). Both have been scanned by GritFlow's 4-layer security protocol.
